Snapping when awakened

Subject: Re: Dog having Nervous Breakdown?

classes, etc.

up,

said

You MURDERED your own DEAD DOG Summer.

'Tending To Agree With The Positive Reinforcement Method'?

HOWEDY People,

Hello Tara,

m...

> I tend to agree with the positive reinforcement > method.

Oh, that's nice. I tend to think people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement methods tend to be pulling our chains... That's what I tend to think, based on my experience working with people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement who TEND TO hurt their dogs when their tendencies to use positive methods are outweighed by their tendencies to run out of information or intellect and TEND to get frustrated and TEND NOT to do the things they TEND TO believe are right, when they TEND to be frustrated, or TEND to be at a loss for INTELLECT, and TEND TO resort to violence because they TEND to be shy on BRAINS... I TEND TO view those folks as hypocrites, that's what I TEND to do because I just happen to TEND to be HONEST,

> IMO, shock collars should be used only after normal > obedience training methods have failed.

If your NORMAL obedience training TENDED to properly train dogs, there would be a TENDENCY to have well trained dogs. But that's not the case, becasuse NORMAL obedience training TENDS to provoke, intimidate, and confound your dog and inhibit his ability to think and learn to want to work and think and learn... SEE?

That's what I TEND to think about NORMAL obedience training which TENDS to FAIL because it TENDS to resort to VIOLENCE instead of TENDING TOWARDS THE MOST EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC METHODS AVAILABLE.

> It just bothers me to imagine shocking my dog, even > at a very low frequency.

It bothers me less to think of shocking the dog than thinking about what punishment and confrontation can do to a dog's temperament. That's what I tend to think based on my thirty eight years professional experience training dogs.

> I will definitely admit that there are many dogs who > either can't or won't benefit from training without > such things as e-collars.

Is that based on your thirty eight years of experience specializing in temperament and behavior problems and protection training in giant breed dogs? Or is that based on your TENDANCY to believe incompetent dog abusing Thugs who tell you they TEND to get excellent results from HURTING dogs to train them because they TEND NOT TO be intelligent enough to outwit the cunning of the domestic puppy dog???

OR IS IT BASED ON YOUR TENDENCY TO MURDER YOUR OWN DEAD DOG Summer?

> I just hope its a last-resort, not a first.

And I just hope you figure out why your pals here who hurt dogs to train them TEND to claim they have me in their killfiles, because they TEND NOT TO be able to answer my questions in good conscience...That's what they TEND to do around here because our lying dog abusing Thugs TEND to be INCOMPETENT, IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, UNPRINCIPLED, DOG ABUSING COWARDS.

Like yourself.

That's what I tend to think.

Your pal, Jerry 'The PHONY,' Howe. j;~} The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{) ; ~ ) >

Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:12:11 GMT Local: Thurs, Oct 7 2004 10:12 am

Subject: 'I'm Shocked That I Shocked' tara o. aka tee, NC Boxer Rescue Abuse

HOWEDY People

Here's WON of HOWER MENTAL CASES hurtin dogs and lying abHOWET it again.

'I'm shocked that I shocked'

> Due to someone reprimanding Jar-Jar & the word > 'rescue' in the post, I decided to read down and see > what he was spewing now. I was able to learn that > besides choking, pinching, crating, abusing and > murdering my dog, I also shocked her. I must be > suffering from amnesia.

> Can someone point me to a post where I said > I shocked my dog, or any dog, or that I even > know *how* to use an e-collar....assuming I had one > which must have been stolen at the same time I lost > my memory.

> One would think Jerry would be happy with the > 'murder' part and all my other training sins but > evidently not. >

HOWEDY marcel the imbecile idiot liar dog abuser coward phd psychoclHOWEN,

LikeWIZE NOTE that you ARE a proven liar and dog abuser punk thug coward mental case, marcel.

You mean she's AFRAID, marcel the imbecile idiot liar dog abuser coward mental case phd psychoclHOWEN?

Oh? You mean kinda like HOWE your own dog did when he bit your Mrs. on accHOWENT of you ABUSE him, marcel?

CuriHOWES ain't it, HOWE most of HOWER dog lover's dogs GOT THE SAME SAME SAME SAME PROBLEM for the SAME SAME SAME SAME REASON, eh marcel the idiot imbecile liar phd psychoclHOWEN?

BWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAHAHAHHAHHAAAAA!!!

HERE'S HOWE COME:

Date: 15 Mar 2005 17:20:17 -0800 Subject: Re: Dog having Nervous Breakdown?

classes, etc.

up,

said

You MURDERED your own DEAD DOG Summer.

'Tending To Agree With The Positive Reinforcement Method'?

HOWEDY People,

Hello Tara,

m...

> I tend to agree with the positive reinforcement > method.

Oh, that's nice. I tend to think people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement methods tend to be pulling our chains... That's what I tend to think, based on my experience working with people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement who TEND TO hurt their dogs when their tendencies to use positive methods are outweighed by their tendencies to run out of information or intellect and TEND to get frustrated and TEND NOT to do the things they TEND TO believe are right, when they TEND to be frustrated, or TEND to be at a loss for INTELLECT, and TEND TO resort to violence because they TEND to be shy on BRAINS... I TEND TO view those folks as hypocrites, that's what I TEND to do because I just happen to TEND to be HONEST,

> IMO, shock collars should be used only after normal > obedience training methods have failed.

If your NORMAL obedience training TENDED to properly train dogs, there would be a TENDENCY to have well trained dogs. But that's not the case, becasuse NORMAL obedience training TENDS to provoke, intimidate, and confound your dog and inhibit his ability to think and learn to want to work and think and learn... SEE?

That's what I TEND to think about NORMAL obedience training which TENDS to FAIL because it TENDS to resort to VIOLENCE instead of TENDING TOWARDS THE MOST EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC METHODS AVAILABLE.

> It just bothers me to imagine shocking my dog, even > at a very low frequency.

It bothers me less to think of shocking the dog than thinking about what punishment and confrontation can do to a dog's temperament. That's what I tend to think based on my thirty eight years professional experience training dogs.

> I will definitely admit that there are many dogs who > either can't or won't benefit from training without > such things as e-collars.

Is that based on your thirty eight years of experience specializing in temperament and behavior problems and protection training in giant breed dogs? Or is that based on your TENDANCY to believe incompetent dog abusing Thugs who tell you they TEND to get excellent results from HURTING dogs to train them because they TEND NOT TO be intelligent enough to outwit the cunning of the domestic puppy dog???

OR IS IT BASED ON YOUR TENDENCY TO MURDER YOUR OWN DEAD DOG Summer?

> I just hope its a last-resort, not a first.

And I just hope you figure out why your pals here who hurt dogs to train them TEND to claim they have me in their killfiles, because they TEND NOT TO be able to answer my questions in good conscience...That's what they TEND to do around here because our lying dog abusing Thugs TEND to be INCOMPETENT, IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, UNPRINCIPLED, DOG ABUSING COWARDS.

Like yourself.

That's what I tend to think.

Your pal, Jerry 'The PHONY,' Howe. j;~} The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{) ; ~ ) >

Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:12:11 GMT Local: Thurs, Oct 7 2004 10:12 am

Subject: 'I'm Shocked That I Shocked' tara o. aka tee, NC Boxer Rescue Abuse

HOWEDY People

Here's WON of HOWER MENTAL CASES hurtin dogs and lying abHOWET it again.

'I'm shocked that I shocked'

> Due to someone reprimanding Jar-Jar & the word > 'rescue' in the post, I decided to read down and see > what he was spewing now. I was able to learn that > besides choking, pinching, crating, abusing and > murdering my dog, I also shocked her. I must be > suffering from amnesia.

> Can someone point me to a post where I said > I shocked my dog, or any dog, or that I even > know *how* to use an e-collar....assuming I had one > which must have been stolen at the same time I lost > my memory.

> One would think Jerry would be happy with the > 'murder' part and all my other training sins but > evidently not. >

HOWEDY spot,

THAT'S SHEER IDIOCY, spot. The dog is AFRAID and NEEDS HEELP.

Your dogs snap at you bums on accHOWENT of you CHOKE and SHOCK and INTIMIDATE and BRIBE and lock them in boxes and deny and withhold attention affection and so called rewards.

PERHAPS THAT'S on accHOWENT of you ENJOY HURTIN HIM?

LUCKY THING your pal bill is a DOG LOVER or someWON might suggest he's a dog abusing punk thug coward mental case like the other cretins like tara o. aka tee who MURDERED her own DEAD DOG Summer for the SAME SAME SAME SAME REASON?

BWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAHAHAHHAHHAAAAA!!!

'Tending To Agree With The Positive Reinforcement Method'?

HOWEDY People,

Hello Tara,

m...

> I tend to agree with the positive reinforcement > method.

Oh, that's nice. I tend to think people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement methods tend to be pulling our chains... That's what I tend to think, based on my experience working with people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement who TEND TO hurt their dogs when their tendencies to use positive methods are outweighed by their tendencies to run out of information or intellect and TEND to get frustrated and TEND NOT to do the things they TEND TO believe are right, when they TEND to be frustrated, or TEND to be at a loss for INTELLECT, and TEND TO resort to violence because they TEND to be shy on BRAINS... I TEND TO view those folks as hypocrites, that's what I TEND to do because I just happen to TEND to be HONEST,

> IMO, shock collars should be used only after normal > obedience training methods have failed.

If your NORMAL obedience training TENDED to properly train dogs, there would be a TENDENCY to have well trained dogs. But that's not the case, becasuse NORMAL obedience training TENDS to provoke, intimidate, and confound your dog and inhibit his ability to think and learn to want to work and think and learn... SEE?

That's what I TEND to think about NORMAL obedience training which TENDS to FAIL because it TENDS to resort to VIOLENCE instead of TENDING TOWARDS THE MOST EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC METHODS AVAILABLE.

> It just bothers me to imagine shocking my dog, even > at a very low frequency.

It bothers me less to think of shocking the dog than thinking about what punishment and confrontation can do to a dog's temperament. That's what I tend to think based on my thirty eight years professional experience training dogs.

> I will definitely admit that there are many dogs who > either can't or won't benefit from training without > such things as e-collars.

Is that based on your thirty eight years of experience specializing in temperament and behavior problems and protection training in giant breed dogs? Or is that based on your TENDANCY to believe incompetent dog abusing Thugs who tell you they TEND to get excellent results from HURTING dogs to train them because they TEND NOT TO be intelligent enough to outwit the cunning of the domestic puppy dog???

OR IS IT BASED ON YOUR TENDENCY TO MURDER YOUR OWN DEAD DOG Summer?

> I just hope its a last-resort, not a first.

And I just hope you figure out why your pals here who hurt dogs to train them TEND to claim they have me in their killfiles, because they TEND NOT TO be able to answer my questions in good conscience...That's what they TEND to do around here because our lying dog abusing Thugs TEND to be INCOMPETENT, IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, UNPRINCIPLED, DOG ABUSING COWARDS.

Like yourself.

That's what I tend to think.

Your pal, Jerry 'The PHONY,' Howe. j;~} The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{) ; ~ ) >

Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:12:11 GMT Local: Thurs, Oct 7 2004 10:12 am

Subject: 'I'm Shocked That I Shocked' tara o. aka tee, NC Boxer Rescue Abuse

HOWEDY People

Here's WON of HOWER MENTAL CASES hurtin dogs and lying abHOWET it again.

'I'm shocked that I shocked'

> Due to someone reprimanding Jar-Jar & the word > 'rescue' in the post, I decided to read down and see > what he was spewing now. I was able to learn that > besides choking, pinching, crating, abusing and > murdering my dog, I also shocked her. I must be > suffering from amnesia.

> Can someone point me to a post where I said > I shocked my dog, or any dog, or that I even > know *how* to use an e-collar....assuming I had one > which must have been stolen at the same time I lost > my memory.

> One would think Jerry would be happy with the > 'murder' part and all my other training sins but > evidently not. >