This disclaimer does not save you.
I've come to a realization that most people who are so strongly against declawing are those that have seen surgeries that were botched, or done hastily, or badly, or the healing went wrong.
No. The basic reason is that the procedure is *unnecessary*. It has *no* - zip, nil, nada, absoposilutively ZERO - benefit to the cat. That makes it inhumane, regardless of how 'competently' it might be done.
Our staff veterinarian said she has seen good vets and bad vets do the surgery, and the mutilation comes in when they do the clip-n-glue and remove the entire toe. Good vets will actually do surgery and just remove the nail.
Either your staff vet needs to go back to vet school, or you misheard what was said.
They don't clip the bone, they don't remove more than absolutely necessary.
Absolute nonsense. It is *necessary* to remove bone in declawing. The procedure to 'scrape out' just the claw DOES NOT WORK. The claw grows back, often deformed, requiring *more* surgery later. The only way to stop claw (re)growth is to remove the distal phalanx.
Before you start screaming, realize that I'm not pro-declawing.
Try getting a clue first.
http://www.stopdeclawing.com/